Understanding Autism: Restaurant Meltdowns

asd

I sat in a popular restaurant chain and watched an 8 year old boy have a major meltdown at his table.  His mother cringed as lunch time patrons stared.  An irritated couple at a nearby booth got up and moved, but only after glaring at the mother.  I’ll be honest, the child was disrupting my lunch too, but one thing I suspected was that this child had autism.  He appeared to be just like any other child, but the intensity of his outburst was out of proportion to the issue he was yelling about: The waiter had served him waffle fries and he had expected “skinny fries” just like the french fries served at home.

April is National Autism Awareness Month.  The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that 1 in 68 children are reported to have autism (ASD) and most are boys. Chances are, you know someone with autism.

What distinctive characteristics of ASD can affect a child’s ability to adjust to unexpected life events, even something as incidental as waffle fries?  Let’s look very briefly at some of the central features of ASD, while keeping in mind that this a spectrum disorder, with symptoms ranging from mild to severe and this list does not encompass all of the elements of a diagnosis. Just some of the central features that kids with ASD have difficulty with are:

  1. Social interaction, often including social reciprocity or that back and forth communication exchange known as conversation.
  2. Restricted behaviors and the need for “sameness” or the inability to be flexible with change.
  3. Hypersensitive and/or hyposensitive “to sensory aspects of the environment” which can hinder their ability to tolerate different tastes, temperature and/or textures of food and deal with change in general.

As a pediatric therapist,  I assess and treat a child’s ability to allocate specific cognitive resources in the brain to manage day-to-day life.  As adults, we too have to utilize many different parts of our brains throughout the day.  But what happens when we are bombarded with sensory input and suddenly, we have to adjust to unfamiliar stimuli? To understand what it’s like, consider this example:

You are driving the minivan full of kids to soccer practice, radio blaring, kids chattering.  Your brain is operating relatively smoothly, filtering auditory, visual, tactile and other sensations, while remembering to use your turn signal, maintain the speed limit, etc.  Suddenly, the weather changes and it starts to hail.  What’s the first thing you do?  Turn off the radio and tell the kids “Shush…Mommy needs to concentrate on the road.”  Perhaps you even slow down so that you can focus on the sudden change in driving conditions.  You have eliminated as much sensory input as possible so that you can concentrate on the task at hand – driving safely.  Isn’t it interesting that  you were driving perfectly fine until one unpredictable event changed in your environment?

Now consider the child with autism as he attempts to engage in mealtimes.  The reality is that daily life changes as easily as the daily weather report and for him, some days are just like driving through a hailstorm.  This child is already challenged by poor sensory processing; he has limited ability to take in information through all of the senses, process it and filter out the unimportant info, and then act upon only the relevant sensory input.

Now, bring that child to the family dinner table, which is all about social interaction and conversation.  Put a plate of food in front of him which looks and smells completely different from the last meal he was served.   Then, tell him to try that steamed broccoli for the very first time.  He doesn’t get to turn down the sensory input bombarding him at the table and focus just on the broccoli.  Because he has autism, he can’t always filter out which stimuli might be inconsequential and it feels so much safer to follow rigid behavior patterns and never try anything new.  Life for a child with autism is all about sticking to sameness. My role as a therapist is to help the child learn to deal with change.

A 2013 study from the Department of Pediatrics at Emory University indicated that kids with ASD are five times more likely to have feeding problems compared to their peers.  Once feeding difficulties are addressed in the home, restaurants are the next step for their families.  Here, the visual input is completely different and it changes constantly, the inconsistent auditory input can be overwhelming, the fluctuating smells may be interpreted as noxious, etc.   Every input to every sense has changed.   Once again, the child with autism is encountering a hailstorm and has to learn to tune out the distractions and focus on the task at hand – in this case, eating a meal away from home.  In this young man’s case, waffle fries were just too much to handle after managing all of the other sensory stimuli at the restaurant.

Perhaps you are a parent of a child with ASD.  Perhaps you have observed a child whom you suspect may be dealing with the daily challenges  of autism.  Thank you for considering what mealtimes feel like for him and his family.  It does get better, but it is a journey that requires patience from family, friends and the community.

Please share this article with a friend so that we can continue to raise awareness of autism spectrum disorder and if you know someone who loves a child with ASD, do something special for them this month in honor of National Autism Awareness Month – thank you!

Melanie Potock, MA, CCC-SLP, treats children birth to teens who have difficulty eating.  She is the author of Happy Mealtimes with Happy Kids and the producer of the award-winning kids’ CD Dancing in the Kitchen: Songs that Celebrate the Joy of Food!  Melanie’s two-day course on pediatric feeding is  offered for ASHA CEUs and includes both her book and CD for each attendee.  She can be reached at Melanie@mymunchbug.com.

Aural Rehab: Are We Getting the Job Done?

tin can 2Aural rehabilitation was once the root of our profession. ASHA defines it as “an ecological interactive process that facilitates one’s ability to minimize or prevent the limitations and restrictions that auditory dysfunctions can impose on well-being and communication, including interpersonal, psycho-social, educational and vocational functioning.” Audiologists know the importance of providing our patients with education, counseling, and training to overcome the challenges presented by hearing loss. However, the most recent MarkeTrak survey results indicate that very few of us are actually providing these services to our patients. This is an unsettling finding to say the least.

I truly believe that most audiologists attempt to provide their patients with adequate education and counseling. However, these MarkeTrak survey results prove that our attempts are not being received by our patients. I believe there are two factors at play: technological overwhelm, and unrealistic expectations. Patients are often so overwhelmed by the vast array of technology at their fingertips that their sole focus is on the technical workings of the hearing aids and wireless accessories. In addition, the vast improvements in technology lead our patients to believe that the hearing aids alone should address all their communication problems. What we are missing is a standardized, effective, and efficient aural rehab protocol that helps our patients to retain what they have learned, and use the strategies we teach them.

As a practicing audiologist, I face these challenges on a daily basis. As technology progresses, I find myself spending more clinic time educating my patients on the technical aspects of their new hearing aids. In a busy ENT clinic, time is of the essence, and this leaves very little time for counseling about realistic expectations, communication strategies, and auditory training. I tried various educational handouts as well as group AR classes, but struggled with patient compliance. I also found it difficult to engage family members in the rehabilitation process. When I read the MarkeTrak survey results, I realized I wasn’t the only audiologist facing these challenges. So in 2013 I set out to develop a fun and effective approach to aural rehab that would be easy for patients to comply with, and efficient for professionals to implement. I call it Cut to the Chase Counseling. There are three simple steps to this aural rehab approach:

1. Education: Patients need to be educated in a fun, easy, and efficient way. While there are many great educational materials on the market, I chose to create my own patient guidebook that organizes communication strategies into five simple keys (see below) that are easy for patients to remember. It is also important that our education addresses realistic hearing aid expectations as well as the importance of family member involvement. Our aural rehab approach defines the following components as the “5 Keys to Communication Success.” I will discuss these further in future blog posts.

2. Action: Patients need to immediately act on what they’ve learned to begin creating new communication habits early in their rehab process. We start this action with personalized Successful Communication Plans that guide the patient and their communication partners as they apply the five keys to their most challenging communication situations.

3. Follow-up: Patients simply cannot absorb and retain all of the education and counseling during their hearing aid trial period. They are often so overwhelmed by their hearing aids, that they may actually remember precious little from what we have been teaching them. For this reason, they must receive some kind of regular follow-up education. Studies show that consistent long-term follow-up drastically increases patient compliance and satisfaction. We provide this follow-up in the form of weekly emails that patients receive for an entire year following their hearing aid fitting. These emails reinforce effective communication strategies and encourage the patients to return to their hearing care professional with any questions or concerns.

We know that our job as rehabilitative audiologists goes far beyond fitting hearing aids. I hope this simple three-step approach will provide an efficient way for professionals to ensure that education and counseling are an integral part of every hearing aid fitting. In the following five blogs, I will dig deeper into the five keys to communication success and give you strategies for integrating them into your practice.

Dr. Dusty Ann Jessen, AuD, is a practicing audiologist in a busy ENT clinic in Littleton, Colo. She is the founder of Cut to the Chase Communication, LLC, a company dedicated to providing “fun, easy, and effective” counseling tools for busy hearing care professionals. She is also the author of Frustrated by Hearing Loss? 5 Keys to Communication Success. Dr. Jessen can be contacted at info@CutToTheChaseCommunication.com. 

Schools Serving Students with Telepractice Deserve Parity in Medicaid Reimbursement

United

Aesop coined the phrase “United we stand, divided we fall.” But what do we do when we cannot find partners to stand with?

Nationally, a shortage of speech-language pathologists often prevents children from receiving services they desperately need.

The State of Telepractice

Spurred by ASHA’s 2005 recognition of telepractice, thousands of SLPs have participated in telepractice so far. Telepractice is thriving; more than 10,000 SLPs have applied to PresenceLearning alone and many more are interested in telepractice considering the many other providers like Visual Speech Therapy and Vocovision.

The fast adoption of telepractice was driven by the well known shortage of SLPs, offering clinicians new work/life and professional choices. However, as accumulated research–40 peer reviewed studies at last count–has shown that telepractice is just as, if not more, effective than traditional, onsite therapy, the uses of telepractice have broadened.

Telepractice is now used to bring children together for social pragmatic groups, connect kids with bilingual therapists, strategically alter the frequency and intensity of therapy, improve SLPs’ schedules, bring in specialists, and re-engage students in middle and high school.

The Problem With Medicaid

One obstacle remains in many states that prevents SLPs from working via telepractice: Medicaid reimbursement. This is a critical issue, as schools can receive reimbursement for up to 50 percent of costs from Medicaid and are often unable or unwilling to adopt telepractice services without this reimbursement. ASHA, to its credit, has been a leader in advocating for school-based Medicaid reimbursement.

State policies preventing Medicaid reimbursement are oversights rather than outright bans. Policy has simply not kept pace with advancements in our field. In fact, most state policies don’t even comment on telepractice.

Many states, including California, Colorado, Virginia, Minnesota, Ohio, have updated their regulations, creating a precedent for other states to follow. These states handle Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding in the same way as before, but with a modifier indicating tele-delivery.

In the remaining states, the impact is large and negative:

  • SLPs wanting to work via telepractice, many of them retirees or recent parents seeking flexible work, effectively cannot do so within their state.
  • Hundreds of thousands of students not receiving services because of the SLP shortage will continue without the care of a SLP and fall further behind in critical areas like reading, writing and communicating.
  • Schools struggling to fill their share of the 5,000+ unfilled SLP openings will remain at significant legal risk from non-compliance.

Unfortunately, underserved districts and their students in rural areas and the urban core will continue to be hit the hardest until this blind spot in Medicaid policy is remedied.

What Must Happen

Medicaid reimbursement inequality must be resolved in all 50 states. There are important issues of equity for rural and urban core students, as well as the viability of access to telepractice for SLPs and students alike.

How can you help?

The only way to help is, in the words of Aesop and others, stand together for this cause. Here’s how we can stand together:

  • Review your state’s current policies for Medicaid reimbursement regarding telepractice.
  • Contact your state administrator of Medicaid for education to express your concern on this issue.
  • Cite specific examples of how tele-therapy reimbursement would benefit students in your district and similar districts in your  state.

With a cohesive message and ample support from fellow educators, gaining Medicaid reimbursement for tele-therapy for school-based speech-language therapy services can be a reality sooner than you think.

 

Melissa Jakubowitz, MA, CCC-SLP, is the Vice President of SLP Clinical Services at PresenceLearning. She is a Board Recognized Specialist in Child Language with more than with more than 20 years of clinical and managerial experience. She is the past-president of the California Speech-Language-Hearing Association and is active in ASHA, serving as a Legislative Counselor for 12 years.

Five Ways to Empower Your Client

empower

For the past two years, I have shared an article with my graduate AAC class that a close colleague gave me. The article, titled Empowering Nonvocal Populations: An Emerging Concept was written by Sandy Damico in 1994. Although this article is now almost 20 years old, there are certain concepts that are timeless and empowerment is one of them. According to Ashcroft (1987), an “empowered individual is one who believes in her or his ability to act, accomplish some objective, or control his or her situation.”

Each time I read this article, it empowers me to do a better job as a speech-language pathologist and continue to empower the people around me. It also always gives me perspective on why certain clients are more successful than others. It also helps me reflect on how to empower not just my clients, but my own children. At a recent lunch with a friend who has two children with special needs, we started discussing goals for our children. She shared with me that she does not have high hopes for her children because they have special needs.  I talked to her about empowering her own children because if she didn’t believe in their ability, how can she expect them to believe in themselves?

Here are five ways that you can empower your clients:

  1. Complete a comprehensive assessment to create goals that are appropriate and attainable. If a proper assessment is not done, then the goals may not be appropriate. For example, we need to think about “What are my client’s strengths?”, “What goals will be most functional for him/her?” On the other hand, focusing on goals that have already been attained previously will not empower a person.  If a child or adult feels that a person doesn’t expect anything from them, then why try? We need to challenge our clients but in a way that is attainable with appropriate and functional goals.
  2. Tell your client, “You can do it,” and believe it yourself. This is a simple tip but has worked for me time and time again. There are two parts to this statement. Saying “You can do it,” and not believing it in yourself will not empower your client. We need to tell your client this statement, but in our hearts know they can do it. There have been many evaluation and therapy sessions where others have told me “He can’t do anything,” “He is very low functioning and doesn’t communicate,” etc. I strongly believe that everyone communicates in their own way and it’s our job to find that way and expand on it.
  3. Empower your client’s family. This is a very important tip. Some families may feel defeated or have given up on your client’s ability to communicate. They may have been told time and time again that their child can’t do this, can’t do that, etc. After awhile, a person can start believing it. Empowering families and giving them positive feedback and suggestions about their loved ones is key.
  4. Teach your client a new skill that will change their life (e.g. cooking, etc). Teaching a child or adult a new skill that can positively affect their life can be extremely empowering. I currently see a client who is independent in many aspects of his life as far as hygiene, transportation, etc. However, one skill he was lacking was his ability to prepare food for himself. He was limited to microwaving unhealthy foods because he did not know how to cook simple dishes.  To empower him, we decided to use cooking as an activity to meet his speech and language goals. I am a true believer in increasing independence because with independence comes empowerment.
  5. Don’t give up. Reach out to supervisors, colleagues, etc. It is important to reach out to others if you feel that your strategies and/or techniques are not working for an individual. If you feel defeated with a client, he or she will sense that and in turn feel disempowered. It may just take one or two sessions with some help from a supervisor or colleague to change your entire perspective of your client. If you still feel that you cannot meet their needs, it may be appropriate to refer your client.  Also, use outside resources. I find many excellent posts written on one of my favorite websites (written by Carol Zangari and Robin Parker).

 

Rebecca Eisenberg, MS, CCC-SLP, is a speech-language pathologist, author, instructor, and parent of two young children, who began her website www.gravitybread.com to create a resource for parents to help make mealtime an enriched learning experience . She discusses the benefits of reading to young children during mealtime, shares recipes with language tips and carryover activities, reviews children’s books for typical children and those with special needs as well as educational apps. She has worked for many years with both children and adults with developmental disabilities in a variety of settings including schools, day habilitation programs, home care and clinics. She can be reached at becca@gravitybread.com, or you can follow her on Facebook; on Twitter; or on Pinterest.

NIMTR: Not In My Treatment Room!

poison

You’ve heard of NIMBY, “not-in-my-backyard” haven’t you?  Well there’s a new acronym, NIMTR or “not-in-my-therapy-treatment-room!”  Speech-language pathologists are inundated by catalogs filled with wonderful colorful, fragrant, pliable toys as treatment materials.  We use these every day with our students, our clients in clinics, our bedside patients.  But how much do we really know about the safety and makeup of those therapy materials your shrinking budget dollars are purchasing every year?

Some interesting facts about toys.

Toys are BIG business. Just visit any mall in America or website such as Amazon.com.  Worldwide, over 80 billion dollars were spent on toys in 2009, with more than a quarter of that money consumed in the United States. The latest figures by the Toy Industry Association Inc., places the annual U.S. domestic toy market at $22 billion in 2012.  Of this, $6.63 billion covers toys and articles for infants and toddlers, puzzles and games, and arts and crafts.  I mention these specific categories because they are materials most likely to be used by SLPs working with young children in early intervention, preschool, or school settings.

So many toys … but are they safe?

The United States imports many more toys from foreign countries compared to its exports. China, Japan, Mexico, Canada and Denmark lead the way in toy imports.  Since other countries do not implement the same environmental protections in manufacturing as we do in the states, the question of safety looms large.  The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is the main body responsible for overseeing the safety and recall of unsafe toys and products manufactured in or imported into the United States.  In 2012, the CPSC released a new risk assessment tool to help improve the screening of imported products. About 5 percent of the total number of these screenings identified children’s products.  One example: a shipment of 28,000 baby bottles imported by Dollar Tree was seized after determining they were defective and unsafe using the new risk assessment tool. You can read more about the successes of CPSC online.

The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 made it mandatory for all toys aimed at children under the age of 14 to meet new federal safety standards.  Some of these include testing lead content and concentration of phthalates (DEHP, DBP and BBP* in particular). Here is a video to see how CPSC works collaboratively with other government agencies to seize toy imports that are unsafe for children.

Even though we have protections, toys of questionable safety continue to enter the consumer market.  Recently DNAinfo in New York released this alarming report, which shows many toys in stores tested positive for elevated levels of toxic substances, including phthalates, which have been found to be associated with asthma, birth defects and hormone disruption, among other health problems. One item on the list, a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles pencil case manufactured by Innovative Design was found to contain 150 times the legal phthalate limit for toys. But alas, currently, it does not qualify as a toy under federal regulations.

What if it is not a toy?

And that’s a good point: Sometimes SLPs use materials in their practice that are not toys. Like the pencil case mentioned above or what about commonly used rubber tubing that a speech-language pathologist may use during treatment for oral exercises?  Would such rubber tubing be considered a toy, a medical device, or something else?  Who oversees the safety of products such as these?

Two organizations responsible for developing standards of safety are the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in Switzerland and the American Society for Testing and Materials International  based in Pennsylvania.  Both provide standards to industries that produce just about everything, from iron bolts to bathmats.  Each provides standards for purchase to companies, who in turn use the standards to manufacture and distribute their product to specification.  I contacted both these organizations to find what standards exist for the rubber tubing example.  As of this writing, no responses to my request have been received.

What is an SLP to do?

So what can you do to ensure that the materials you use with your students and clients are safe?  Here are a few suggestions:

  1. If you are purchasing from a distributor online, check their website for more information. For example, SuperDuper Publications places a Product Safety statement on their website and invites customers to email them for more information.  Companies who openly provide statements such as these make it easier for the consumer to trust the safety of their purchases.  If you cannot find information on product safety or product testing, email the company and ask for it.
  2. Check the CPSC’s website for toy and product recalls. You can find the latest recalls, search for recalls by product name or by country of manufacture, and also report an unsafe product.
  3. Read the manual! Electronics such as iPads and tablets come with a manual that will often provide the ISO or ASTM Int’l standard used to insure safety and will list potential hazards.
  4. Contact the manufacturer of the product and ask for the MSDS – materials safety data sheet.  This would be a good choice if the product you have or consider purchasing lacks a manual or an information sheet on standards testing.  You also can look up a product by name and manufacturer on the MSDS website. On this site a search for “rubber tube” gave me 34 hits.  While searches can be daunting and time consuming, the insurance of safety provides peace of mind to you and the clients on your caseload.
  5. Avoid buying inexpensive toys or materials from questionable sources such as street vendors.

Informed SLPs can now approach their materials purchases with a new savvy.  Next time you are tempted to buy inexpensive therapy materials composed of questionable ingredients, just say “NIMTR”!!!!

 

Anastasia Antoniadis is with the Tuscarora (PA) Intermediate Unit and works as a state consultant for Early Intervention Technical Assistance through the Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network. She earned a Master of Arts degree in speech pathology from City College of the City University of New York and a Master’s degree in public health from Temple University. She was a practicing pediatric SLP for 14 years before becoming an early childhood consultant for Pennsylvania’s early intervention system. Her public health studies have been in the area of environmental health and data mapping using geographic information system technology.  You can follow her on Twitter @SLPS4HlthySchools.

Aphasia: How a Video IS Worth a Thousand Words

 

words

I have been a practicing speech-language pathologist for the past 40 years. My last position prior to my retirement in September of this year was as an out-patient SLP at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) rehab clinic working primarily with stroke and head injury patients. Ours is a rewarding profession but during the past year and a half my involvement in a community aphasia support group has been one of the most gratifying experiences of my career.

Approximately two years ago, the daughter of a stroke survivor contacted VCUHS Speech/Language Pathology Department asking for volunteers to help her start an aphasia support group in Richmond, Va. She indicated that she wanted to form the support group to provide her mother and others living with aphasia the opportunity to exchange information, opinions, and feelings about this communication disorder.

The first group meeting was held in February 2012. The discussions during the monthly meetings often focused on how little the general public knew about aphasia. Other recurring topics included: loss of insurance coverage for out-patient speech treatment due to “plateau in skills” or insurance caps; false assumption that loss of language means loss of intellect; family members and others lacking appreciation of what it is like to have a head full of thoughts and ideas but not be able to communicate these thoughts to others. One of the group members, a corporate trainer prior to his stroke and subsequent aphasia, had an idea about how to address these problems/misconceptions: He proposed making a video that recorded the personal narratives of group members to educate healthcare professionals as well as their own families and friends on the daily challenges of living with aphasia and strategies for being a good communication partner. He and other group members felt that who best to advocate for aphasia patients than those living with aphasia themselves?

This past year, Marcia Robbins and Kate Schmick (two other SLPs who volunteer with the group), Jan Thomas (support group member who has taken a leadership role in the group), and I applied for and received funding through the VCUHS Speech/Language Pathology Department to produce a documentary style video on living with aphasia. Eric Futterman, a Richmond-based videographer, filmed and narrated scenes of aphasia support group members going through their daily routines and one member interacting with SLP. The 18-minute video highlighted the fact that those living with aphasia were not a homogenous group but rather individuals with unique needs and challenges as they faced the difficult road to recovery from their stroke. The video also showed support group members getting on with living and finding new talents. Our group had a community premier of the video entitled “Patience, Listening and Communicating with Aphasia Patients” during our September, 2013 monthly support group meeting. 90 people from the community attended. Attendees remarked on the powerful and informative message of the film.

In an effort to spread the word about aphasia, we have contacted the National Stroke Association and the National Aphasia Association about posting this video on their websites. NSA already has posted the video on their website.

Susan Hapala, M.Ed.,CCC-SLP, is a retired speech-language pathologist who volunteers with the Richmond, Virginia Aphasia Support Group. She can be reached at rva.aphasia@gmail.com.

Kid Confidential-Behavior Disorders and Language Impairment in School-Age Children

Mayblog

 

In January, I read an article published in ASHA’s SIG 16 Perspectives December 2012 issue by Alexandra Hollo from the Department of Special Education, at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., titled “Language and Behavior Disorders in School-Age Children: Comorbidity and Communication in the Classroom.”  She brought up some really good points that I think we, as SLPs, need to keep in mind when discussing, assessing and treating children who are labeled with behavior disorders.

Hollo discusses how often times children labeled with EBD (emotional and behavioral disorders) also have undiagnosed LI (language impairment).  According to this article, “Four out of five students with EBD are likely to have an unidentified language deficit,” which may result in children resorting to physical communication rather than effective use of expressive language to resolve issues.  In fact, it is estimated that 80.6 percent of students with EBD also have LI however, more than 50 percent of those LI diagnoses remain unidentified.  If staff members fail to recognize the child’s inability to functionally communicate, negative feelings and interactions between the student and staff members may result, which in turn negatively affects academic achievement. What is known about children with EBD is that they “have the most negative short- and long-term outcomes” (Hollo, 2012).

So what does EBD look like in children?  Well Hollo explains the two subcategories of EBD according to the DSM-IV, difficulties with internalizing and externalizing.  Deficits in internalizing include emotional withdrawal behaviors such as depression, anxiety or mood disorders.  Academic trends for these students with internalizing problems include high rates of absenteeism and low academic achievement.  Deficits in externalizing include disruptive behavior as in ADHD, ODD or conduct disorder.  Students with externalizing deficits tend to be more easily identified and receive services possibly due to the fact that their behavior is disruptive in the academic setting and can more easily be determined to interfere with learning.  Academic trends for students with externalizing issues:  disruptive behavior tends to interrupt and/or terminate instruction and therefore affect learning.  More importantly, it was stated that although students with EBD do perform similarly to those with other disorders on standardized tests, their academic performance tends to be BELOW that of other students with disabilities.

In addition to academic deficits, children with EBD also demonstrate deficits in language and social skills.  These children more often exhibit expressive language deficits rather than deficits in receptive language, and they tend to use simplified language within the classroom environment resulting in teachers grossly overestimating the student’s expressive language abilities.  It is important to note that based on Hollo’s research, the CELF and TOLD were the only two language tests that were able to consistently identify LI in children already diagnosed with EBD.

 

Socially, children with EBD tend to have negative teacher interactions, are often times rejected or victimized by peers, and struggle with use of effective conversational skills due to difficulties in initiating and maintaining friendships, problem solving deficits, and difficulties cooperating and collaborating with peers and adults.  In addition, students with EBD tend to be impulsive and struggle with the use of “inner dialogue” to effectively reason prior to responding to their emotions within various situations.  Their ability to control their emotions, follow directions, and transition between activities, classes and subjects is also affected.

Why is this information important for us as SLPs to know?  Well we must first be educated on the comorbidity between EBD and LI to effectively screen, assess, and treat these students.  We also have the responsibility to train staff members on the child’s communication and social skills deficits so as their behaviors may not be misconstrued.  We as SLPs can be instrumental in implementing linguistic supports for these children which include direct (i.e. teaching emotional language, using self-talk for regulation and problem solving skills, provide opportunities to practice negotiations with peers, etc.) and indirect instruction (i.e. collaborate with staff, train teachers on effective communication styles, teach use of slow rate of speech, etc.).  In addition, we can work with behavioral specialists to follow and enforce the behavioral supports that are deemed necessary to help students with EBD be successful in their daily environments.

So the next time you are in your weekly RTI meeting discussing a “problem child” or a “shy, quiet student,” pay attention, and keep in mind that EBD does not look the same in every child. Some behaviors may in fact be linked to language deficits.  Only we, as SLPs will be able to make that determination effectively in order to ensure students receive the services and support they require.

Note:  This entire article was not discussed in detail here.  I discussed the information I felt was important based on my personal clinical experiences.  I refer you to Hollo’s complete article in the December 2012 SIG 16 issue for further information and details.

Maria Del Duca, M.S. CCC-SLP, is a pediatric speech-language pathologist in southern, Arizona.  She owns a private practice, Communication Station: Speech Therapy, PLLC, and has a speech and language blog under the same name.  Maria received her master’s degree from Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania.  She has been practicing as an ASHA certified member since 2003 and is an affiliate of Special Interest Group 16, School-Based Issues.  She has experience in various settings such as private practice, hospital and school environments and has practiced speech pathology in NJ, MD, KS and now AZ.  Maria has a passion for early childhood, autism spectrum disorders, rare syndromes, and childhood Apraxia of speech.  For more information, visit her blog or find her on Facebook.

ASHA’s Listen To Your Buds Campaign Brings Safe Listening Message to The 2013 International Consumer Electronics Show

LTYBCESBoothSm

Annette Gorey, ASHA’s Public Relations Specialist, works to get ASHA’s booth ready for the show.

More than 150,000 people may hear more about ASHA’s Listen to Your Buds campaign at this week’s 2013 International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas. This marks ASHA’s fifth consecutive year as a CES exhibitor, and the ASHA Public Relations team couldn’t be more excited to spread the word about listening safely and preventing noise-induced hearing loss.

The Listen to Your Buds exhibit will be in the heart of the CES Digital Health Summit. And new this year, ASHA joins the show’s MommyTech Summit to connect with influencers, mommy bloggers, key children’s health and technology media and more. We’ll convey how Listen to Your Buds can help parents help young people use personal audio technology safely. As you probably well know, the parent blogosphere is more powerful than ever and growing fast. This is an increasingly important audience for our Listen to Your Buds campaign and outreach efforts.

The time has never been riper for a safe listening message. Spend a day with a toddler, elementary school student, tween or teen – or just walk around the mall, stand in line at Starbucks or stroll down the street – and you can’t help but see how kids are more connected to personal audio devices than ever before. Headphones have become a fashion item. The latest color iPod is in the hands of a six-year-old. Teens are at the gym listening to music. And this past holiday season, personal audio technology items were among the hottest gifts around. Now, in the wake of technology gift-giving and increased daily technology time, parents should monitor their child’s usage and volume levels and model safe listening behaviors – and the tips at www.listentoyourbuds.org can help.

We know even minimal hearing loss can affect children’s social interaction, communication skills, behavior, emotional development, and academic performance. Some parents are now realizing this, too. Eighty-four percent of parents are concerned that misuse of personal audio technology damages the hearing of children, according to the results of an online poll commissioned by ASHA last May. Parents also show overwhelming support for hearing screenings for tweens and teens—71% for 10- to 11-year-olds and 67% for 16- to 17-year-olds—according to a University of Michigan Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health released just last month.

ASHA’s exhibit booth in the Living in Digital Times area has information about hearing loss prevention, warning signs of hearing damage, and how to find a local ASHA-certified audiologist using ASHA’s ProSearch. ASHA member and Las Vegas audiologist Dr. Daniel Fesler, CCC-A and Buds Coalition Musician Oran Etkin will be on hand to talk with attendees.

The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), who puts on the CES each year, is among the Buds’ dozen dedicated sponsors; we joined forces in 2007. Recently, CEA President and CEO Gary Shapiro highlighted just how important the Buds message is. “As a longtime supporter of the Listen To Your Buds youth campaign, CEA represents companies that create audio technologies for listeners of all ages,” says Gary Shapiro, president and CEO of CEA. “We promote products, like noise-canceling and sound-isolating headphones, that help minimize outside sounds, and volume-controlled headphones that give control to parents of young children. New innovations are still to come that will help us practice and teach safe listening so that we can all listen for a lifetime.’”

Erin Mantz is a Public Relations Manager for ASHA.

Don’t Procrastinate, Advocate!

Rotunda at the U.S. Capitol, Washington DC

Photo by Tadson

The typical student in Communication Sciences and Disorders wears many hats. These may include student, clinician, graduate assistant, and about a million others that vary from person to programs, alike. One hat, which should be worn by all CSD students, is that of an advocate for our profession.  Sometimes, as students, it may feel as if our voices get lost in the cacophony of noise in the professional world.  There are over 12,000 members of NSSLHA. If we come together, our voice can be heard and we can make an impact on the future of our profession. It is never too early to begin advocating for the careers and the clients we will spend a significant portion of our lives helping.

TODAY, September 19, is NSSLHA’s 2nd Annual Virtual Advocacy Day! Virtual Advocacy Day provides a mechanism for students to learn just how easy it is to become an advocate. Through this event, and others, we are establishing a way for all NSSLHA members to learn how to correspond with their elected representatives at both the state and national level. Coming together, our message will become loud, and make our voices heard. This will benefit the profession at large and the patients whose lives we impact. Imagine the impact of senators and representatives receiving hundreds of e-mails all on the same topic during the same day. This will certainly peak the curiosity of a legislative assistant whose grandmother recently had a stroke, or nephew was just diagnosed with autism. During the Executive Council’s “hill visits” in the spring, we have seen firsthand the impact of educating the members of congress.

This year, there are three key national issues we are stressing: IDEA Funding, Medicare Therapy Caps, and the Hearing Aid Tax Credit Bill. More information is available about each of these bills at the ASHA Advocacy Center. You can also search for local legislative issues relevant for an individual state. Professionals, we encourage you to join with us for this day of advocacy. Collaboration between students and professionals is critical. You serve as our role models and mentors and we will one day join you as peers in professional careers. We encourage you to stand with us and write your elected officials as well!

You can participate in 5 simple steps:

  1. Visit the ASHA Take Action Center.
  2. Select the “Students Take Action” link to view additional information on key issues.
  3. Edit the letter to your liking. The more personalized information and stories you provide the more effective the communication.
  4. Enter your contact information in the fields to the right of the letter. Based on your address, the system will automatically identify your members of Congress. Make sure to identify yourself as a student and insert your school name.
  5. Select “Send Message” and you’re done!

 

Caleb McNiece is 3rd year doctoral student in Audiology at the University of Memphis. He received his B.A. in Communication Sciences & Disorders and Spanish from Harding University. He is a trainee on the US Department of Education funded project, “Working with Interpreters,” at the University of Memphis. Caleb serves as the Region 3 representative to the NSSLHA Executive Council chairing the Social Media Committee and as President of the University of Memphis NSSLHA Chapter.


Rene Utianski is a Doctoral Candidate in Speech and Hearing Science at Arizona State University and a Research Collaborator at Mayo Clinic-Arizona. She received her B.A. in Speech and Hearing Science and Psychology from The George Washington University and her M.S. in Communication Sciences and Disorders from Arizona State University. Rene serves as the Region 9 Regional Councilor on the NSSLHA Executive Council and is the 2012-2013 Council President.

ASHA/NSSLHA Student Hill Day 2012

ASHA/NSSLHA Student Hill Day 2012 was a success!  On April 2nd 2012, the NSSLHA Board, along with over 100 fellow speech-language pathology and audiology students had the opportunity to meet with our state representatives and senators on Capitol Hill to discuss legislature important for the future of our profession.  With the help of the ASHA Federal Advocacy team, over 250 visits were conducted to bring audiology and speech-language pathology issues to the offices of those who represent us.  This means that students are impacting how these offices think about our services.  We were able to talk about what we do, the individuals who makes our jobs so special, and what legislation would truly allow us to help others more efficiently and effectively.  Even as students, we can impact federal legislation, which affects the future of our profession.

ASHA provides an abundance of information regarding current legislation and how each of us can get involved at the state and federal level. Even if a visit to Capitol Hill is not an option, a letter, email, or phone call is a great opportunity to let your Members of Congress know what’s important to his/her constituents.  You can visit the ASHA Take Action Center for more information.  It is never too early to begin advocating for our chosen professions.  Even as students, we are also voting members and we can have an impact on how services are rendered.  If you are interested in participating in future Student Hill Day visits, please contact Caroline Goncalves with the Federal Advocacy Team at ASHA at cgoncalves@asha.org .

Imagine the impact we can have if the Student Hill Day gets bigger and bigger each year?  Speak out and be heard by those who represent you and take charge of our professional future!

 

Ellen Crowell Poland, AuD/PhD Student, East Carolina University NSSLHA Executive Board Member-at-Large and Caleb McNiece, AuD Student, University of Memphis NSSLHA Executive Board Region 3 Councilor, wrote this piece for ASHAsphere.